Despite Critics Abortion Breast Cancer Link Grows

without comments

By Nathan A. Cherry, 09/28/2010 

 
Abortion breast cancer linked

More women are learning the truth of the abortion, breast cancer link.

 Martinsburg, WV – Much debate continues as to whether there is a link between abortion and cancer in women; in particular breast cancer. Many on the pro-life side believe that such a link is more than evident and plenty of empirical evidence proves the claim. Abortion advocates continue to shrug their shoulders and deny the reality of the deadly link.

Recently a microbiologist by the name of Dr. Gerard Nadal decided to post every study concluding the existence of the abortion-breast cancer link on his blog. He plans to post one a day until he has posted them all, according to a report from LifeNews.com.

What makes this so interesting is that he will publish studies by both abortion opponents and advocates alike. What is more interesting is that both groups are finding the link to be true.

The very first article he posted was a study by Julie Palmer and Lunn Rosenberg called “Induced and Spontaneous Abortion in Relation to Breast Cancer.”  The conclusions of this study are remarkable considering that Drs. Palmer and Rosenberg are staunch abortion advocates. (Click here to read the article, “The ABC Literature #1”)The following is related:

“Palmer and Rosenberg are not unbiased researchers, which makes their findings even more relevant for women. Instead, they are abortion advocates who have testified as expert witnesses on behalf of abortion businesses in lawsuits challenging the states of Alaska and Florida because of their parental notice or consent laws.
Their study, supported by U.S. National Cancer Institute grants, examined 1,835 women ages 25-64 years with pathologically confirmed, invasive breast cancer and 4,289 women aged 25-64 admitted for nonmalignant or malignant conditions.
Nadal says the study found women who had never had children and who had one case of an induced abortion raised their abortion breast cancer risk by 40 percent.”

So the conclusion is that women who have had an abortion are 40% more likely to develop breast cancer. Despite this fact many abortion advocates continue to say that there is no harm to women in having an abortion. Such obvious neglect in the concern for women’s health and the maternal mortality rate is reprehensible; nearly criminal.

How is it that scientist and doctors have no trouble telling us that we should be eating properly, exercising and staying away from fatty fast foods for our “own good,” but refuse to admit that it is in a woman’s best interest to refuse abortion? I know I have said it time and again but I cannot help but believe that it is all about the money. Abortion is a multi-billion dollar industry and they simply care more about money than women’s health. (Don’t you know Planned Parenthood was foaming at the mouth to get their hands on all our tax dollars built into Obamacare for abortions?)

At some point the evidence has to become so overwhelming that it would be impossible to ignore. Dr. Nadal says there are hundreds of studies showing the link between abortion and breast cancer. For me, it would take just a few to deter me from such a life-changing decision; hundreds should be enough for even the most skeptical of skeptics. Sadly, some still refuse to believe what is best for women.

You can follow Dr. Nadal’s posting of articles showing the link between abortion and breast cancer at his blog: www.gerardnadal.com

Related posts:

  1. Cover Up? Is the Abortion-Breast Cancer Link Being Covered Up?
  2. FPC Media Blitz: LGBT Ordinance Challenged, Abortion Linked to Breast Cancer, Sex-Change Inmate Wants New Prison
  3. Video: Mother Refuses Abortion and Cancer Treatment to Save Unborn Child

Written by Nathan Cherry

September 28th, 2010 at 7:30 am