A recent report shares the following: “This week, both the New York Times and Washington Post rejected a full-page advertisement from American Life League as ‘too graphic’ and ‘shocking’ for their adult readers.’” But before you say a hearty “good for them” to the statement, please understand where the content of these adds that were rejected for their graphic content came from.
American Life League (ALL) is an organization seeking to expose the danger of Planned Parenthood’s sexual indoctrination of kids in schools. The content they put together for their adds, the ones rejected by major newspapers for being “too graphic” came straight from the pages of materials Planned Parenthood distributes to kids in public schools. So, in conclusion, the material is “too graphic” for adult readers, but is suitable for elementary school kids and is being funded by our tax dollars. Good luck making sense out of that nonsensical garbage. Click here for original article.
About Nathan Cherry
Nathan Cherry is the chief editor and blogger for the Engage Family Minute blog, the official blog of the FPCWV. He serves also as the Regional Development Coordinator as a liaison to the pastor's of West Virginia. He is a pro-life, pro-traditional marriage, pro-religious freedom conservative. He is also a husband, father, pastor, author, musician, and follower of Jesus Christ.
I’ve long been interested in the stem cell debate. I don’t know if it’s a fascination with the ability to recreate organs and cure diseases or simply my morbid curiosity over the staunch liberal support of the utterly failed embryonic stem cell research. Either way 
Martinsburg, WV – At the risk of sounding like I’m beating a dead horse – though I suppose I would not be the only one – there’s more good news coming from the Komen decision to defund Planned Parenthood. It is important news because it relates to another ongoing struggle that pro-lifers are slowly but surely winning: stem cell research.
Martinsburg, WV – I do my best to follow the stem cell research news because of its obvious implications in the defense of life from conception; a conviction I firmly espouse. You can probably understand my frustration then, when I read countless articles on the ever-widening successes of adult stem cell research only to see our government refuse to invest in this safe, morally acceptable form of research; while continuing to fund a failure like embryonic stem cell research.
If you want to know more about the difference between these two forms, check out this 