OUTRAGEOUS: Planned Parenthood Advocates Killing Post-Birth Babies (Video)

Alisa LaPolt Snow

Planned Parenthood rep Alisa LaPolt Snow advocates killing children born alive through botched abortions.

“Planned Parenthood is a great organization that does good things,” and “my local clinic doesn’t do abortion.” These are two of the frequent arguments I receive when talking about my opposition to our nation’s most corrupt, criminal abortion merchant. They come from well-meaning people that have not yet figured out that Planned Parenthood will do anything to sell an abortion – including break the law and keep parents in the dark.

And while your local clinic might not do abortions, supporting that clinic supports the organization as a whole, which means your support directly supports every other clinic that does do abortions. So if you’ve eased your conscience by telling yourself it’s okay to support your local Planned Parenthood because they don’t do abortions, I’m here to pierce the fog with truth: you support abortion.

The facts are really simple.

Planned Parenthood was started by a radically liberal woman that believed minorities were inferior races that needed population controlled to prevent spreading in the U.S. So she was a racist. But Planned Parenthood’s founder, Margaret Sanger, also believed in eugenics. According to Dictionary.com, eugenics is “the study of or belief in the possibility of improving the qualities of the human species or a humanpopulation, especially by such means as discouraging reproduction by persons having genetic defects orpresumed to have inheritable undesirable traits…”

In other words Sanger and Planned Parenthood believe in things like forced sterilization for some women, particularly minorities whom they deem to have “inheritable undesirable traits.” This is why most of their “clinics” are in urban areas densely populated with minority people. But despite all I know about Planned Parenthood, even I am in shock over what I recently learned.

A Planned Parenthood affiliate recently refused to acknowledge that a child born alive as a result of a botched abortion was now a patient in need of life saving medical care. She said the decision was between the woman and the abortion provider. In other words, she is admitting that living, breathing babies struggling for life don’t deserve the medical care and attention anyone else does. A recent article recounts part of the exchange between lawmakers and Planned Parenthood representative Alisa LaPolt Snow: [Read more...]

About Nathan Cherry

Nathan Cherry is the chief editor and blogger for the Engage Family Minute blog, the official blog of the FPCWV. He serves also as the Regional Development Coordinator as a liaison to the pastor's of West Virginia. He is a pro-life, pro-traditional marriage, pro-religious freedom conservative. He is also a husband, father, pastor, author, musician, and follower of Jesus Christ.

Pedophilia is Just Another Step Towards A LGBTQIA Society

LGBTQIA prideI’ve written a lot recently on the push to normalize pedophilia. It’s a tough subject for me and, to be honest, I don’t enjoy writing about it. The very idea that anyone would seek to legitimize the objectification and abuse of innocent children is at its core disturbing and evil. That such a movement is gaining ground in courts and social media subculture is disturbing and telling.

Some in our society are seeking to move away from any semblance of morality into an “anything goes” model where even something as sick as sex with children is acceptable. Somehow, what once was categorically denounced as abuse is now being touted by some as “just another alternative lifestyle.”

Wesley J. Smith wrote about the normalizing of pedophilia and accurately summarizes what is taking place behind the publics eye:

“Think about it: If the desire for sexual congress with children is just ‘another orientation’–an odious comparison, in my view–and if some children supposedly ‘like it’ when they voluntarily engage in sex with adults–and indeed, if it doesn’t actually hurt them–how long would the absolute rejection of cross-generation congress last? Not very. It wouldn’t be long until we saw the absolute prohibition on pedophilic sex downgraded to a mere ‘taboo,’ which, as the last fifty years teach us, are made to be broken.”

[Read more...]

About Nathan Cherry

Nathan Cherry is the chief editor and blogger for the Engage Family Minute blog, the official blog of the FPCWV. He serves also as the Regional Development Coordinator as a liaison to the pastor's of West Virginia. He is a pro-life, pro-traditional marriage, pro-religious freedom conservative. He is also a husband, father, pastor, author, musician, and follower of Jesus Christ.

On the 40th Anniversary of Roe v. Wade – Have Pro-Life Advocates won?

Writing at the public discourse, Ryan T. Anderson shares some perspective on the 40th anniversary of Roe v. Wade. He begins by speaking of what happened after the Supreme Court legalized abortion in America and ends with a rally cry for us all. Here’s what he had to say:

“Day after day, another pro-life public figure—Ted Kennedy, Jesse Jackson, Al Gore, Bill Clinton—would have a change of heart and come to embrace abortion on demand. Elites ridiculed pro-lifers as being on the wrong side of history. It looked like a losing battle; how easy it would have been just to give up and go home.

“But courageous people refused to sit silently.

“Academics such as Germain Grisez, John Finnis, Thomas Hilgers, and Hadley Arkes developed the philosophical, scientific, and legal arguments that now roll off our tongues so easily. Activists such as Nellie Gray, Mildred Jefferson, and L. Brent Bozell, Jr., organized the marches, advocacy groups, and think tanks that still fuel the pro-life movement.

“Statesmen such as Henry Hyde, Ronald Reagan, and Ed Meese pushed for the laws, policies, and nomination criteria that changed our political and legal culture. And at the heart of it all were good shepherds like Pastor (later Father) Richard John Neuhaus, John Cardinal O’Connor, and Francis Schaeffer, nourishing the flock for what, in the final analysis, is a spiritual struggle for the Gospel of Life.

“And now, well, the pro-life side has, in a word, won…” Click here for original article.

About Nathan Cherry

Nathan Cherry is the chief editor and blogger for the Engage Family Minute blog, the official blog of the FPCWV. He serves also as the Regional Development Coordinator as a liaison to the pastor's of West Virginia. He is a pro-life, pro-traditional marriage, pro-religious freedom conservative. He is also a husband, father, pastor, author, musician, and follower of Jesus Christ.

Push Coming to Further Legalize Same-Sex “Marriage”

NYTimes.com: “Here in Maine, voters rejected same-sex marriage only three years ago, 53 percent to 47 percent. Mainers United for Marriage, which advocates same-sex marriage rights, phoned some 250,000 residents or knocked on their doors, engaging many of them in 20-minute conversations about love, marriage and commitment and persuading some to rethink their views. ‘We asked people what marriage meant in their lives,’ said Matt McTighe, the group’s campaign manager. Last Tuesday the numbers were reversed, with Maine legalizing same-sex marriage by 53 percent to 47 percent. Douglas Emmons, 52, of Biddeford voted against gay marriage in 2009 but changed his mind this year, he said, after urging by his daughter, a recent college graduate, and an hourlong discussion with Randy Hazelton, a field organizer for Mainers United for Marriage. ’It’s still something that’s uncomfortable; it doesn’t seem quite natural,’ Mr. Emmons said. ‘But I guess everybody should have an equal chance at marriage if they want it.’” Click here for original article.

About Nathan Cherry

Nathan Cherry is the chief editor and blogger for the Engage Family Minute blog, the official blog of the FPCWV. He serves also as the Regional Development Coordinator as a liaison to the pastor's of West Virginia. He is a pro-life, pro-traditional marriage, pro-religious freedom conservative. He is also a husband, father, pastor, author, musician, and follower of Jesus Christ.

Gay Rights Advocates Prepared to Push Obama

Recent headlines say that gay rights advocates are prepared to push Obama to move on some of their top agenda items. One article states: “Buoyed by the approval of same-sex marriage in several states on Election Day, lobbyists for gay-rights groups plan to prod the president to sign an executive order that would ban discrimination by federal contractors against gay and transgendered people. The White House shelved the executive order earlier this year, but it remains a top priority for gay-rights groups. They argue that if Obama signs the order it could encourage Capitol Hill to pass broader legislation that would extend a similar ban to employers.” We can reasonably expect to see these issues surface often and for many of them to be passed via executive order by Obama during his second term. The concern for a policy like this, and the resultant ENDA policy that would follow, is that it is likely to spread over to churches, religious schools, charities, organizations, and others with a moral or religious conviction again homosexuality. Considering how the HHS mandate turned out, there is no reason to believe the Obama administration will protect religious rights. Click here for original article.

About Nathan Cherry

Nathan Cherry is the chief editor and blogger for the Engage Family Minute blog, the official blog of the FPCWV. He serves also as the Regional Development Coordinator as a liaison to the pastor's of West Virginia. He is a pro-life, pro-traditional marriage, pro-religious freedom conservative. He is also a husband, father, pastor, author, musician, and follower of Jesus Christ.

Disapproval Does Not Equal Hate – Particularly Towards Homosexuals

Is it possible to disagree with someone and still love them? A new tactic by homosexual advocates is asking that very question in an effort to get same-sex “marriage” legalized. A recent article states: “Increasingly, advocates of same-sex marriage are abandoning legalistic arguments about “equality” and “civil rights,” and appealing to emotion and personal relationships instead. “We (gays and lesbians) are your neighbors, your friends, your co-workers, your classmates and your relatives,” the argument goes. “If you respect and care about us, how can you deny us what we want?” The logic seems sound initially, but reason breaks it down quickly. Just as parents don’t approve of a child’s behavior and still loves their child deeply, so too is it possible to disapprove of homosexuality while still loving the person. The idea that people should be given everything they want is immature at best, dangerous at worst. Where does this line of thinking end? Click here for original article.

About Nathan Cherry

Nathan Cherry is the chief editor and blogger for the Engage Family Minute blog, the official blog of the FPCWV. He serves also as the Regional Development Coordinator as a liaison to the pastor's of West Virginia. He is a pro-life, pro-traditional marriage, pro-religious freedom conservative. He is also a husband, father, pastor, author, musician, and follower of Jesus Christ.

If Pro-Abortion Advocates Read These 10 Questions – They Might Be Pro-Life

Trevin WaxI mentioned this post by Trevin Wax at The Gospel Coalition last week, but wanted to bring it to your attention again. Trevin’s questions that every pro-abortion proponent should answer are pointed and thought provoking. They are questions I doubt any self-described pro-abortion proponent has seriously considered because, if they had, I believe we would have far fewer abortion advocates.

In my opinion, it seems the vocal, militant abortion advocates are far less concerned with women’s health and “reproductive rights” than they are with ensuring they have the right to kill an unborn child. Any woman seriously concerned about maternal health would not advocate for abortion as the link between abortion and breast cancer, mental health issues, and future pregnancy complications are well documented.

So really, this seems to be more about making sure sex is as uncomplicated and responsibility free as possible. How else can women, claiming to care about “women’s rights” wage a war on unborn girls through gendercide? While conservatives and pro-life advocates seek to protect unborn girls the liberal left accuses us of a…war on women? Once again liberal ideology doesn’t make any sense to me.

Read these questions and see if the pro-abortion position makes any sense to you.

[Read more...]

About Nathan Cherry

Nathan Cherry is the chief editor and blogger for the Engage Family Minute blog, the official blog of the FPCWV. He serves also as the Regional Development Coordinator as a liaison to the pastor's of West Virginia. He is a pro-life, pro-traditional marriage, pro-religious freedom conservative. He is also a husband, father, pastor, author, musician, and follower of Jesus Christ.

We Can Kill Unborn Children Because They Don’t Feel Pain

by Nathan A. Cherry, 08/08/2012

Many in the media and among pro-abortion advocates are clinging to the flawed belief that an unborn child, at 20 weeks, cannot feel pain. In the wake of at least 9 states enacting Pain Capable Unborn Child Protection Act’s, pro-abortion advocates are getting nervous and looking for ways to stem the tide of pro-life laws being enacted. In an effort to defeat the bill in D.C. to stop abortion on demand up to the moment of birth, which was ultimately defeated, pro-abortion advocates argued that the logic and science of these bills is flawed. LifeNews.com reports on the comments made by a Harvard Law Professor: “Cohen, like many in the mainstream media, claims science does not support the notion that the unborn can feel pain at 20 weeks. He does his best to portray the debate as being between the scientific community and know-nothing pro-life activists. TheChronicle of Higher Education ran a useful article in the summer of 2011 detailing the debate within the scientific community on this issue. The article cited a number of prominent neonatal and pediatric researchers, none of whom are involved with the pro-life movement, who argue that the unborn can feel pain at 20 weeks.” Click here for original article.

About Nathan Cherry

Nathan Cherry is the chief editor and blogger for the Engage Family Minute blog, the official blog of the FPCWV. He serves also as the Regional Development Coordinator as a liaison to the pastor's of West Virginia. He is a pro-life, pro-traditional marriage, pro-religious freedom conservative. He is also a husband, father, pastor, author, musician, and follower of Jesus Christ.

Is This the Prevailing Opinion on Same Sex “Marriage”?

by Nathan A. Cherry, 07/10/2012

Many believe that a new, prevailing opinion on same-sex “marriage” is sweeping across the America. The view states that while people don’t necessarily agree with homosexuality and same-sex “marriage,” that they should be legalized and affirmed in the spirit of fairness and equality. David Blankenhorn writes:  “I don’t believe that opposite-sex and same-sex relationships are the same, but I do believe, with growing numbers of Americans, that the time for denigrating or stigmatizing same-sex relationships is over.” Is this where most Americans now stand on the issue? Recent evidence from Prop 8 in California and Amendment 1 in North Carolina. This is a tactic used by homosexual advocates and liberals to try and persuade those with religious and moral convictions against same-sex “marriage” to forego their conviction sand “join the majority.” Truth is, those supporting traditional marriage are in a super majority. Click here to read the original article.

About Nathan Cherry

Nathan Cherry is the chief editor and blogger for the Engage Family Minute blog, the official blog of the FPCWV. He serves also as the Regional Development Coordinator as a liaison to the pastor's of West Virginia. He is a pro-life, pro-traditional marriage, pro-religious freedom conservative. He is also a husband, father, pastor, author, musician, and follower of Jesus Christ.

Child Raised By Gay Father “Comes Out” That She Is…Christian!

by Nathan A. Cherry, 07/10/2012

Out From Under BookMany people, even Christians, won’t speak honestly about homosexuality. Even Christians that believe what the Bible teaches, that homosexuality is sinful and wrong, won’t admit such a belief in public for fear of retribution. Ironically, some of the most outspoken and vocal opponents of homosexuality are either former homosexuals or adults that were raised as children by homosexual parents in the gay community.

One such vocal opponent is Dawn Stefanowicz, a Canadian author and speaker whose book “Out From Under” details her childhood raised by a homosexual father and his many lovers. Catholic World Report released an interview with Dawn stating that today “She is a licensed accountant, a Christian, a public advocate of children being reared in homes with opposite-sex, married couples, and a vocal defender of traditional marriage. She has been married to a man for 28 years, and has two teenaged children.”

[Read more...]

About Nathan Cherry

Nathan Cherry is the chief editor and blogger for the Engage Family Minute blog, the official blog of the FPCWV. He serves also as the Regional Development Coordinator as a liaison to the pastor's of West Virginia. He is a pro-life, pro-traditional marriage, pro-religious freedom conservative. He is also a husband, father, pastor, author, musician, and follower of Jesus Christ.