LifeSiteNews.com reports: ”The period for Americans to comment on the proposed regulation – which would force employers to provide contraception, sterilization, and abortifacient drugs to all employees with no co-pay – ended yesterday. The Sunlight Foundation notes that the controversial provision has generated ‘more comments than any other regulatory proposal on any subject government-wide.’ A coalition of supporters, including Planned Parenthood and NARAL Pro-Choice America, says its groups delivered nearly 350,000 messages of support for the mandate.”
Now that the period for public comment is over, we can expect the finalized policy to be revealed soon. The HHS mandate remains one of the most unpopular ever passed, and will no doubt continue to be challenged in court. Americans don’t want to be forced to violate their religious beliefs and certainly the 1st Amendment – among others – ensures we should not be forced to violate our convictions. We will continue to oppose this terrible mandate and its life-ending policies. Click here for original article.
About Nathan Cherry
Nathan Cherry is the chief editor and blogger for the Engage Family Minute blog, the official blog of the FPCWV. He serves also as the Regional Development Coordinator as a liaison to the pastor's of West Virginia. He is a pro-life, pro-traditional marriage, pro-religious freedom conservative. He is also a husband, father, pastor, author, musician, and follower of Jesus Christ.
The Obama administration doesn’t think it’s “conservative” for a government to tell women what health care choices she should make. Neither do I. For that matter I don’t know many conservatives that believe the government should be telling women what kind of health care choices she should be making. But the difference between me and the president is that I don’t think the government should be paying for contraception, or telling employers what they have to provide in their health insurance plans.
There’s a growing public concern that society is out of control – sexually. Unlike China though we aren’t worried about a population explosion or even controlling our population; the concern is over what seem to be increasing policies designed to affirm sex as nothing more than a recreational activity. This new ideology, sometimes called sexualityism, is the belief that the answer can be found in “uncommitted, unencumbered, inconsequential sex,” according to Helen Alvare in 
Did you know that you as an individual are not protected by the Religious Freedom clause of the First Amendment? Yeah, in other words, your church services on Sunday and all actions taking place there are protected and the government cannot interfere with them. But, your rights stop the moment you leave the church and enter the “secular” world and workplace. Did you know that?
