If you’ve never read the writing of Doug Mainwaring on the issue of same-sex “marriage” you really need to. What makes his opinion so interesting is first, he is an intelligent conservative thinker able to expertly communicate his thoughts. But even more interesting is that he is also gay. The fact that he is a gay, conservative thinker that is vocally opposed to same-sex “marriage” has to infuriate the liberal left. And yet, that is the very thing that makes him so credible. He recently made this comment:
“Proponents know that the aura of fairness and equity associated with the same-sex marriage movement will soon dissipate…There’s a reason for this. Proponents of same-sex marriage must derail public discourse and demand quick action via judicial, executive, and/or legislative fiat; otherwise their mission is doomed.”
Mainwaring goes to explain that the great rush to support same-sex “marriage” by both the left and the right has more to do with political chess playing than any noble civil rights support. More importantly, he exposes the very weak foundation of the issue as it compares with prohibition from years ago. To sum up his thoughts would be to conclude that there is not really a rush to marry on the part of homosexuals at all. Mainwaring gives the following as just one example: [Read more...]
About Nathan Cherry
Nathan Cherry is the chief editor and blogger for the Engage Family Minute blog, the official blog of the FPCWV. He serves also as the Regional Development Coordinator as a liaison to the pastor's of West Virginia. He is a pro-life, pro-traditional marriage, pro-religious freedom conservative. He is also a husband, father, pastor, author, musician, and follower of Jesus Christ.

Doug Mainwaring makes headlines wherever he goes because he vocally opposes same-sex “marriage.” That’s not really why he makes headlines though; it is the fact that he himself is a gay man that gets him attention. Many don’t want to believe that a homosexual would ever oppose same-sex “marriage,” but Mainwaring says you can’t redefine marriage, only “undefined” it.