It’s just bad practice to create policy and procedures based on “fluid” sexual orientation or gender identity. It elevates the “rights” of a few people above all others and creates a special class of citizens that the government has take a special interest in. But that doesn’t stop some, like a school in Oregon from creating bathrooms for their 5-10 transgender students. Such a move opens the school up for liability based on discrimination, and abuse claims. But here’s what a school principal said of the move:
“We just need to make sure that all students are safe and comfortable here, and that they have their needs met…If they feel unsafe using the bathroom, that’s a problem.” Hmm, so if another student somehow “feels unsafe” will the school create a special bathroom, locker room, or water fountain for that student? What if a student’s exercise, porn, or ice-cream “needs” aren’t being met, will the school accommodate? These absurd guidelines are helping drive down academic performance among American schools while increasing the political propaganda in our schools. Click here for original article.
About Nathan Cherry
Nathan Cherry is the chief editor and blogger for the Engage Family Minute blog, the official blog of the FPCWV. He serves also as the Regional Development Coordinator as a liaison to the pastor's of West Virginia. He is a pro-life, pro-traditional marriage, pro-religious freedom conservative. He is also a husband, father, pastor, author, musician, and follower of Jesus Christ.
To read a recent West Virginia State Journal article on the pending EHNDA bill in the legislature, you would think the capitol was overrun by supporters of the bill. But according to an eye-witness I spoke with, there was more people being presented to on the stage than in the audience. This is just another instance of a mainstream news outlet using semantics to create a favorable perception.
I dare you to do a study on sex-segregated learning environments. What most people don’t know, and most lawmakers don’t want to admit, is that sex-segregated learning environments are far more successful that mixed-sex environments. When you remove the distraction of sexual attraction, learning ability increases. This was common practice until feminists complained that it was unfair and demanded equality. The next thing you know our teen pregnancy rate skyrockets. That’s some great equality right there.
Sex is a serious subject, not to be taken lightly; as the inherent responsibilities and consequences demand mature treatment. Sexuality is an even broader, far more serious subject. One would think sexuality would be reserved for, perhaps high-school students; and even then treated with delicacy and maturity. The idea of implementing explicit sexuality into the classroom before high school seems reckless at best. But the idea of introducing homosexual indoctrination intended to make classes “gay friendly” for pre-schoolers is moral negligence at its worst.
The issue of gender identity is inextricably linked to sexuality and marriage. The debate over the definition of marriage will be irreversibly affected if changed, and you can bet that those advocating for gender identity recognition will play a role in the outcome. You see, it used to be that there were heterosexual men and women, and homosexual men and women; oh for the days of simplicity.
Martinsburg, WV – Earlier I wrote an article commenting on an author’s recent query of “
