Great Commission Politics: A Lesson from ESPN and Chris Broussard

Jason CollinsProfessional basketball player, Jason Collins, came out in recent days in a Sport Illustrated article and announced that he is a homosexual. According to news reports, he is the first athlete in the four major men’s professional sports leagues to do so. The media was quick to celebrate his announcement. Report after report lauded his courage, boldness, and honesty. According to the Huffington Post, President Obama called Collins to express his support and was impressed with Collins’ courage. First Lady Michele Obama tweeted her support for Collins. One would think the leader of the free world would have more pressing issues to deal with than who an NBA player is having sex with, but that is another issue for another day.

ESPN Analyst, Chris Broussard, was asked to reconcile Collins’ reported faith with his homosexuality on ESPN’s “Outside the Lines.”  Broussard, an outspoken Christian, said it was not a union supported by biblical teachings. “Personally, I don’t believe that you can live an openly homosexual lifestyle or an openly, like premarital sex between heterosexuals. If you are living that type of lifestyle, the Bible says you know them by their fruits, it says that’s a sin,” said Broussard. “If you’re openly living in unrepentant sin, whatever it may be, not just homosexuality, whatever it maybe, I believe that’s walking in open rebellion to God and to Jesus Christ.” A firestorm followed, with calls for Broussard to be fired for his comments. So far, ESPN has not taken such action. [Read more...]

5 States Now Considering Marriage Redefinition

Legislators in five states are considering marriage redefinition bills:

  • Delaware: The House approved a bill today that could create same-sex marriage. It would still have to be passed by the Senate and signed into law. Under the legislation, no new civil unions would be performed after July 1, and existing civil unions would be converted to marriages.
  • Rhode Island: The Senate Judiciary Committee voted 7-4 today to send a same-sex marriage bill to the full Senate. The House approved the bill in January. It would create same-sex marriage. Civil unions would become marriages on Jan. 1, 2014.
  • Illinois: The Senate approved a same-sex marriage bill on Feb. 14. A date has not been set for the full House vote on the legislation.
  • Minnesota: Legislation that would create same-sex marriage has not yet reached the floors of the House or Senate. A bipartisan group of legislators introduced the bill in February. It would repeal a 1997 law defining marriage as a union between one man and one woman.
  • Nevada: Lawmakers passed a resolution Monday in the Senate that could redefine marriage. If the entire Legislature approves it this session, they will need to do so again in 2015. Voters would have to approve it in 2016.

The District of Columbia and nine states — Connecticut, Vermont, New Hampshire, Iowa, Washington, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts and New York — have all redefined marriage.

Thirty-one states have amendments defending marriage. Click here for original article.

About Nathan Cherry

Nathan Cherry is the chief editor and blogger for the Engage Family Minute blog, the official blog of the FPCWV. He serves also as the Regional Development Coordinator as a liaison to the pastor's of West Virginia. He is a pro-life, pro-traditional marriage, pro-religious freedom conservative. He is also a husband, father, pastor, author, musician, and follower of Jesus Christ.

Gay Activist Says Gay Activists Lie About Marriage

When is the last time you hear a gay activist say that they lie about marriage not changing? or that marriage should not exist at all? Most of the time they talk about nothing changing and that they simply want the same rights as everyone else. But this is the truth straight from a gay activist herself:

“It’s a no-brainer that (homosexual activists) should have the right to marry, but I also think equally that it’s a no-brainer that the institution of marriage should not exist. …(F)ighting for gay marriage generally involves lying about what we are going to do with marriage when we get there — because we lie that the institution of marriage is not going to change, and that is a lie. The institution of marriage is going to change, and it should change. And again, I don’t think it should exist.”

Still think it won’t hurt you or your marriage if same-sex “marriage” is legalized. Wake up! Click here for original article.

About Nathan Cherry

Nathan Cherry is the chief editor and blogger for the Engage Family Minute blog, the official blog of the FPCWV. He serves also as the Regional Development Coordinator as a liaison to the pastor's of West Virginia. He is a pro-life, pro-traditional marriage, pro-religious freedom conservative. He is also a husband, father, pastor, author, musician, and follower of Jesus Christ.

Why Evangelicals and Libertarians Should Have a Talk About Marriage

government marriageI recently wrote of my conversation with a libertarian friend on the topic of marriage and the view that marriage belongs, at best, in the hands of the people of each state and not in the hands of the federal government. You can read the article here. While I won’t say I’m a full-blown libertarian on the issue, I can see myself leaning that direction. It just makes sense.

Why would we ask the government to regulate something it has nothing to do with creating, defining, or ordaining in the first place? We get angry when the government wants to tell us that abortion is acceptable because we believe human life is inherently valuable and should be defended. The government intrusion on and killing of human life via abortion seems very much the same as asking the government to regulate marriage: they have no business doing either. Every life is sacred and should be defended so too marriage is sacred and not for the government to sanction, redefine, or otherwise alter.

Potential 2016 presidential candidate Rand Paul wants to see the matter put back in the hands of the people in each state in order to continue the conversation in hopes of winning the “hearts and minds” of people back to traditional marriage. He said in a recent interview:

“Because I think right now if we say we believe in a federally mandated one man, one woman marriage, we’re going to lose that battle, because the country is going the other way right now. If we were to say each state can decide, I think a good 25, 30 states still do believe in traditional marriage and maybe we allow the debate to go on for another couple of decades and see if we can still win back the hearts and minds of people.”

[Read more...]

About Nathan Cherry

Nathan Cherry is the chief editor and blogger for the Engage Family Minute blog, the official blog of the FPCWV. He serves also as the Regional Development Coordinator as a liaison to the pastor's of West Virginia. He is a pro-life, pro-traditional marriage, pro-religious freedom conservative. He is also a husband, father, pastor, author, musician, and follower of Jesus Christ.

Christians Persecuted for Their Religious Convictions – in America!

religious persecutionThe media doesn’t do a very good job of reporting religious persecution in America or worldwide for that matter. I suppose many don’t believe such a thing exists. That would be a mistake of epic proportions and provide a false sense of security that will lull the victim to sleep as those bent on destroying religious freedom enact their plans. Just in case you didn’t know religious persecutions was currently taking place in America and worldwide, allow me to share just a few of the many incidents taking place currently.

Washington Attorney General Sues Florist For Anti-Gay Discrimination:

A florist in Washington State refused to provide her services for a same-sex ceremony and is now being sued by the state attorney general. This occurrence highlights the dangers of “non-discrimination” laws that ultimately allow Christians and people of faith to be sued for simply living according to their beliefs. This also shows how the government will try to force people of faith to violate their convictions via federal or state law in order to accomplish their political agenda.

American Arrested for Anti-homosexual Statements:

A 47-year old American was on a tour in the U.K. when he was asked about his views on homosexuality by some gay couples in Scotland. When he shared his view of homosexuality being a sin he was arrested and fined substantially for his words. Consider for a moment the implications of being criminally charged for simply sharing your religious beliefs. Again, non-discrimination laws end up harming no one but those who disagree with the politically correct view. [Read more...]

About Nathan Cherry

Nathan Cherry is the chief editor and blogger for the Engage Family Minute blog, the official blog of the FPCWV. He serves also as the Regional Development Coordinator as a liaison to the pastor's of West Virginia. He is a pro-life, pro-traditional marriage, pro-religious freedom conservative. He is also a husband, father, pastor, author, musician, and follower of Jesus Christ.

Engaging Weekend: Slate Magazine Endorses Polygamy, Boy Scouts poised to Reverse Ban on Homosexuals, Boy Abducted By Government for Being Home Schooled

FPC-BlogUpdate-EngagingWeek

Engaging Weekend is a collection of articles from the weekend that you might have missed. But we thought they were important and wanted to make sure you had a chance to read them.

SLATE: ‘MARRIAGE EQUALITY’ INCLUDES POLYGAMY

We are among the voices declaring that if the government redefines marriage for homosexuals, it will have to redefine it for other groups – such as polygamists, pedophiliacs, etc. – or be guilty of the same discrimination it now accuses traditional marriage advocates of. We are often ridiculed for this position, and yet we are being proven right as these fringe groups begin lining up to declare a “Constitutional right” to their lifestyle choice. Most recently, Slate magazine has printed its full endorsement of polygamy. They say: “The definition of marriage is plastic. Just like heterosexual marriage is no better or worse than homosexual marriage, marriage between two consenting adults is not inherently more or less “correct” than marriage among three (or four, or six) consenting adults. Though polygamists are a minority—a tiny minority, in fact—freedom has no value unless it extends to even the smallest and most marginalized groups among us.” Ugh, where do I begin to pick this apart? Marriage is not the business of the government; it is something that should be in the hands of the people to protect. Traditional marriage holds value for children, families, and society as a whole whereas other arrangements do not. If you read between the lines here, Slate is basically saying anyone should be allowed to do anything. Where does it stop? Click here for original article.

Pressure builds from both sides as Boy Scouts weigh gay policy [Read more...]

About Nathan Cherry

Nathan Cherry is the chief editor and blogger for the Engage Family Minute blog, the official blog of the FPCWV. He serves also as the Regional Development Coordinator as a liaison to the pastor's of West Virginia. He is a pro-life, pro-traditional marriage, pro-religious freedom conservative. He is also a husband, father, pastor, author, musician, and follower of Jesus Christ.

Dad Defends Incest With Daughter

marriage

If the government redefines marriage once, it will continue to do so or face discrimination accusations.

Picture this: A father, a Columbia political science professor admits to having a three year sexual relationship with his adult daughter. This, by definition, is incest. What is the outcome? We would think that public shock, immediate termination, and an ashamed father that runs and hides never to be heard from again. At least any good moral person with an ounce of character believes this is the outcome.

What is currently happening is the father accused of this immorally depraved act is defending his actions and his lawyer is equating it to…wait for it…homosexual sex.

The Supreme Court has not even ruled on the same-sex “marriage” cases it is currently considering and already people are equating other forms of depraved immorality with homosexuality in an effort to win the day and declare their rights. Truly the slippery slope is slippery and people are failing to stand.

Here’s what a recent article said of the case:

“David Epstein was charged last week with one count of incest for what was allegedly a consensual three-year sexual relationship with his daughter. The political science professor at Columbia University, 46, allegedly slept with her between 2006 and 2009. Epstein, who specialises in American politics and voting rights, is also said to have exchanged twisted text messages with the woman during their relationship. Matthew Galluzzo, defending Epstein, has said that even though his daughter had emerged as a victim in the case, she could ‘best be described as an accomplice’. He told ABCNews.com: ‘Academically, we are obviously all morally opposed to incest and rightfully so. At the same time, there is an argument to be made in the Swiss case to let go what goes on privately in bedrooms. ‘It’s ok for homosexuals to do whatever they want in their own home. How is this so different? ‘We have to figure out why some behaviour is tolerated and some is not.’”

[Read more...]

About Nathan Cherry

Nathan Cherry is the chief editor and blogger for the Engage Family Minute blog, the official blog of the FPCWV. He serves also as the Regional Development Coordinator as a liaison to the pastor's of West Virginia. He is a pro-life, pro-traditional marriage, pro-religious freedom conservative. He is also a husband, father, pastor, author, musician, and follower of Jesus Christ.

Same-Sex Marriage is Wildly, Amazingly, Incredibly Popular . . . Except Where It’s Not

According to new polling, when you take out the grand minority of states that have already legalized same-sex marriage, this is a country that is still solidly against redefining a pre-political institution.

According to Harper Polling, 57% of residents of states still holding to the pre-political definition of marriage still favor leaving the institution alone.  Only 34% are inclined to redefine it.  But, there’s more.

Not only is marriage still quite in vogue, politically speaking, it’s dangerous to come out in favor of redefining it in these states.  In fact, 47% of folks surveyed believed that when a candidate changes his or her position to be newly in favor of same-sex marriage, it makes them want to vote them out of office.  And that’s not just Republicans.  52% of Independent voters – the fastest growing segment of voters in the country – and a full 1/3 of Democrats would flip their votes against a candidate changing his or her stance on marriage.

The take-aways are clear.  First, marriage is still wildly popular and the effort to redefine it is hardly inevitable as published.  Take the discussion to the heartland, away from ivory towers and crowded streets of urban America, and most of this country still favors marriage between one man and one woman.

Not only that, but the data is clear: the voters still favor representatives that reflect their views on this topic.  It may seem popular – even for some blue republicans in a blue state like West Virginia – to hedge their political bets by coming out in favor of same-sex marriage (or some variety thereof), but that is simply not the case.  Rather, voters want their politicians to accurately reflect them.  That means politicians ought to stay true to the pre-political institution of marriage between one man and one woman and now cow to the winds of “inevitability” that bluster, but blow few men down.

This article was originally published at jeremydys.com.

About Jeremy Dys

Jeremy Dys is the FPCWV's President and General Counsel. In addition to his duties of providing strategic vision and leadership to the FPCWV, Dys is the chief lobbyist and spokesman. Dys is regularly featured in local, state, and national print, radio, and television outlets. He lives close to Charleston with his wife and growing family.

13 Year Old Student Pens Essay Defending Marriage – And It’s Excellent

Amelia Summerhays recently gave a speech and wrote an essay on marriage in which she said: “…[R]edefining marriage…sets up a new ideal where adults’ needs come first and children’s needs come second. Same-sex marriage is unfair to children because it becomes the tool that separates children from at least one of their parents. When, in reality, marriage is supposed to be connecting children to both of their parents. When a child is separated from a parent through death or divorce, it is a tragedy that changes their whole life. Gay marriage is another thing that can separate children from one of their parents. Why should the government encourage that separation?”

At just 13 years old she shows more wisdom than many two and three times her age. It’s no wonder she was attacked over Facebook and other social media for her views. The liberal left and others seeking to redefine marriage don’t want adults thinking or saying such things, and they certainly don’t want teenagers saying or thinking these things. The push to accept homosexuality and same-sex “marriage” has invaded our public schools in an effort to indoctrinate children to the politically correct view. Obviously Amelia didn’t get the memo. Good for you Amelia. Click here for original article.

About Nathan Cherry

Nathan Cherry is the chief editor and blogger for the Engage Family Minute blog, the official blog of the FPCWV. He serves also as the Regional Development Coordinator as a liaison to the pastor's of West Virginia. He is a pro-life, pro-traditional marriage, pro-religious freedom conservative. He is also a husband, father, pastor, author, musician, and follower of Jesus Christ.

Melissa Harris-Perry Reiterates “Collective” Comments

After causing a stir with her comments that our children belong to everyone, Melissa Harris-Perry reiterating her comments. She wrote: ”What I thought was an uncontroversial comment on my desire for Americans to see children as everyone’s responsibility has created a bit of a tempest in the right’s teapot. Allow me to double down…I have no intention of apologizing for saying that our children, all of our children, are part of more than our households, they are part of our communities and deserve to have the care, attention, resources, respect and opportunities of those communities.”

What we need to understand is that this is simply a step in the process to indoctrinate our children, remove parental rights, and further redefine marriage. If the liberal left can teach our kids whatever they want, without parental involvement or approval, they own our kids. If they own our kids they can further rationalize and justify same-sex “marriage” and depriving kids of a mother and a father by forcing them into the homes of same sex couples via adoption and foster care. This is not a slip of the tongue for Harris-Perry, this is expounding upon an anti-parent, anti-family ideology. Click here for original article.

About Nathan Cherry

Nathan Cherry is the chief editor and blogger for the Engage Family Minute blog, the official blog of the FPCWV. He serves also as the Regional Development Coordinator as a liaison to the pastor's of West Virginia. He is a pro-life, pro-traditional marriage, pro-religious freedom conservative. He is also a husband, father, pastor, author, musician, and follower of Jesus Christ.