Did You know Each State Can Repeal ObamaCare?

A recent article states: “The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) itself empowers states to block the employer mandate, to exempt many of their low- and middle-income taxpayers from the individual mandate, and to reduce federal deficit spending, simply by not establishing a health insurance ‘exchange’…To date, 34 states, accounting for roughly two-thirds of the U.S. population, have refused to create Exchanges. Under the statute, this shields employers in those states from a $2,000 per worker tax that will apply in states that are creating Exchanges (e.g., California, Colorado, New York). Those 34 states have exempted at least 8 million residents from taxes as high as $2,085 on families of four earning as little as $24,000. They have also reduced federal deficits by hundreds of billions of dollars.”

You probably didn’t know that, and won’t hear it on the nightly news. Also unfortunate is the fact that West Virginia, rather than protecting citizens has chosen to full implement ObamaCare. This means higher taxes, fewer choices, and funding abortion against our religious convictions. Our lawmakers seem bent on forcing us to comply with this awful despite the overwhelming opposition to it on the part of Americans, and especially medical professionals. Perhaps we need new lawmakers. Click here for original article.

About Nathan Cherry

Nathan Cherry is the chief editor and blogger for the Engage Family Minute blog, the official blog of the FPCWV. He serves also as the Regional Development Coordinator as a liaison to the pastor's of West Virginia. He is a pro-life, pro-traditional marriage, pro-religious freedom conservative. He is also a husband, father, pastor, author, musician, and follower of Jesus Christ.

Engaging Weekend: White House Says Americans Can Opt Out of ObamaCare, Teachers Want to Make School Curriculum “Gay Friendly,” Doctor Can Kill Child But Boyfriend Can’t

Engaging Weekend Logo

Engaging Weekend is a collection of articles you might have missed over the weekend. But we thought they were important and wanted to make sure you had a chance to read them.

White House: All Americans Can Opt-Out Of ObamaCare

A recent article shares the details of an exchange between a journalist and the White House in which, after being asked about keeping their individual health-care plan, the White House responds by saying that if you have private health insurance you should be able to keep the plan you like. The writer then shares the implications of this news: “What this quite clearly means is that people who object to being forced to pay for abortifants and abortions as part of their “health” insurance plan can simply keep their current plan that doesn’t offer them. It clearly means that we can all have plans that don’t keep our twenty-five year old “children” feeding out of our pocketbooks. Best of all, this obviously means that–unlike ObamaCare plans that none of us have to use–the cost of our premiums will not be going up!” This sounds like great news to me. It remains to be seen if it is in fact true, because to date, all I’ve been able to learn is that private insurance will be overtaken by ObamaCare plans and the plans we currently have will be replaced. This is why so many states are opting out of ObamaCare. Too bad West Virginia has been eating it up and forcing it on West Virginians. Maybe we’ll see something change in the near future. Click here for original article.

Teachers to vote on making everything LBGTTQ friendly [Read more...]

About Nathan Cherry

Nathan Cherry is the chief editor and blogger for the Engage Family Minute blog, the official blog of the FPCWV. He serves also as the Regional Development Coordinator as a liaison to the pastor's of West Virginia. He is a pro-life, pro-traditional marriage, pro-religious freedom conservative. He is also a husband, father, pastor, author, musician, and follower of Jesus Christ.

Could This Lawsuit Kill ObamaCare?

Lawsuits continue to eat away at ObamaCare, most of them based on religious freedom infringement cases. But one lawsuit has the potential to kill the entire bill. A recent article explains: “A challenge filed by the Pacific Legal Foundation contends that the Affordable Care Act is unconstitutional because the bill originated in the Senate, not the House. Under the Origination Clause of the Constitution, all bills raising revenue must begin in the House. The Supreme Court upheld most provisions of the act in June, but Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. took pains in the majority opinion to define Obamacare as a federal tax, not a mandate. That was when the Sacramento, Calif.-based foundation’s attorneys had their ‘aha’ moment.”

Is this why Chief Justice John Roberts so carefully defined ObamaCare as a tax? Is this what he was hoping someone would catch onto and press? I don’t know. But I am hopeful that a case like this one has the ability to kill the entire bill and send it packing. From the beginning the bill has been awful and as we learn more of what is inside we are more concerned for the religious freedoms of Americans, as well as the tax burden that will come with ObamaCare. And there’s no denying that the bill in no way supports life, but there is plenty of support for abortion. For us all, I hope this case proceeds and is successful. Click here for original article.

About Nathan Cherry

Nathan Cherry is the chief editor and blogger for the Engage Family Minute blog, the official blog of the FPCWV. He serves also as the Regional Development Coordinator as a liaison to the pastor's of West Virginia. He is a pro-life, pro-traditional marriage, pro-religious freedom conservative. He is also a husband, father, pastor, author, musician, and follower of Jesus Christ.

Senate Republicans Not Fighting ObamaCare Anymore?

A very pointed article shared the news that Senate Republicans, led by Mitch McConnell will no longer fight to defund or repeal ObamaCare. Though millions of Americans have strongly urged lawmakers in Washington to defund or repeal the awful bill that is costing everyone more in taxes, Republicans have signaled that they are done trying. Practically this means that every American will now be forced to fund abortion and other conscientiously objectionable services in their healthcare. Even though cases are being won left and right against the HHS mandate in court, this evidently is not enough to encourage those that claim to be pro-life to fight to defund this bill. This reiterates the need for Christians to be actively engaged in electing principled people to local office. A recent article comments on a speech given by McConnell at CPAC, where he slyly admits he’s given up:

“The part of his speech that McConnell hopes you ignore is him saying, ‘When it came to Obamacare, we gave it everything we have, everything we have, and we just lost.’ He’s also signaling that the Senate Republicans will neither filibuster the continuing resolution nor shut down the government. The continuing resolution is the best vehicle to use as a fight to defund Obamacare. Republicans will not, despite their rhetoric right now, fight on the debt ceiling to undermine Obamacare.” Click here for original article.

About Nathan Cherry

Nathan Cherry is the chief editor and blogger for the Engage Family Minute blog, the official blog of the FPCWV. He serves also as the Regional Development Coordinator as a liaison to the pastor's of West Virginia. He is a pro-life, pro-traditional marriage, pro-religious freedom conservative. He is also a husband, father, pastor, author, musician, and follower of Jesus Christ.

Doctors Become “Death Panels” With New Federal Guidelines

A major concern over ObamaCare has always been what many believe to be “death panels” hidden deep in the legislation. These panels are a group of unelected decision makers whose function is to determine if people are to be given treatment or not. This is a central aspect to socialized health care which puts the patient after the costs – instead of defending life and putting people first. A new article says that doctors might actually become one person “death panels” with help from the federal government:

“Federal grants from the National Institute on Aging and the American Federation for Aging Research helped pay for researchers at the University of California, San Francisco, to create a ‘mortality index’ designed to aid doctors in decision-making about ‘preventive intervention’ for older patients. The index provides doctors with 12 measures to assign points to an elderly patient. The lower the patient’s total points, the better his or her odds of survival. The highest score, 26 points, represents a 95-percent chance the patient will die within 10 years.” This is all designed to move health care out of the hands of people and into the hands of the government to decide who lives and dies. Click here for original article.

 

About Nathan Cherry

Nathan Cherry is the chief editor and blogger for the Engage Family Minute blog, the official blog of the FPCWV. He serves also as the Regional Development Coordinator as a liaison to the pastor's of West Virginia. He is a pro-life, pro-traditional marriage, pro-religious freedom conservative. He is also a husband, father, pastor, author, musician, and follower of Jesus Christ.

Ohio Finding Ways Around ObamaCare

Lawmakers in the Ohio Legislature are set to introduce “The Health Care Freedom Act.” This bill is designed to protect citizens from the government imposed penalties associated with ObamaCare. A recent article explains: ”HCFA prohibits health insurance companies operating in Ohio from accepting any funding from the federal government that would result in potential penalties for employers or individuals.  If a company chooses to receive federal subsidies, their license would be suspended in the state.  While they would still be able to conduct business previously secured, the company would be barred from writing any new business until the funding is returned to the federal government.  Further, due to the rules set up within PPACA, the subsidized insurance company would be prohibited from participating in any exchange nationwide.”

With the amount of government over reach and infringement on civil and religious freedoms due to ObamaCare, it’s good to see lawmakers taking a stand and fighting to protect their citizens. To date, West Virginia has done nothing but agree to implement ObamaCare, passing on costs to citizens. This will no doubt put an incredible strain on already tight budgets for people throughout the state. It will also force people to violate their religious convictions by being forced to subsidize abortion in the state and around the country. Maybe our lawmakers should look to Ohio for a better example of what to do. Click here for original article.

About Nathan Cherry

Nathan Cherry is the chief editor and blogger for the Engage Family Minute blog, the official blog of the FPCWV. He serves also as the Regional Development Coordinator as a liaison to the pastor's of West Virginia. He is a pro-life, pro-traditional marriage, pro-religious freedom conservative. He is also a husband, father, pastor, author, musician, and follower of Jesus Christ.

Engaging Weekend: Police Chaplain Forced to Resign for Personal Marriage Belief, ObamaCare Getting Beaten in Court, Students Upset Over Special Treatment of Transgender Student

FPC-BlogUpdate-EngagingWeek

Engaging Weekend is a collection of articles you might have missed over the weekend. But we thought they were important and wanted to make sure you had a chance to read them.

Police Chaplain Forced to Step Down After Expressing Views on Same-Sex Marriage

What happens when marriage is redefined? The lesson we can learn from our neighbors across the pond is that every citizen will be forced to affirm the new definition or face punishment. This includes statements made on personal websites. The case of a police chaplain is a prime example of this inevitable outcome. A recent article explains: “A Christian police chaplain has been forced out of his position after expressing his views on the Government’s proposals to introduce same-sex ‘marriages’ on his personal website…Despite making the comments on his personal blog, he was told by a senior officer that his remarks were representative of the force’s views on the issue and violated its ‘equality and diversity policy’. He was forced to step down after being told the he would need to comply with the policy in order to continue in his role as a force chaplain.” This is why “conscience protections” don’t work and amount to little more than a wolf in sheep’s clothing. They are designed to woo unsuspecting conservatives into agreeing to cave on their definition of marriage only long enough to spring a trap that ends with punishment for refusing to affirm the new definition. Cases like this are already happening in the U.S. and we can only expect more if statues like DOMA are eliminated. Click here for original article.

Religious Freedom Outscores Obamacare 12-4 in Court

Just in case you are wondering how the HHS mandate is doing in court, the answer is: terrible. So far 75% of all lawsuits against the mandate have resulted in victory for those claiming infringement on their religious freedom. You would think the Obama administration would take a hint and revise the mandate in a way that truly protects religious freedom, but of course, you would be wrong. The latest victory was recently reported: “A Missouri-based plumbing products manufacturer is the latest company to win a court order against the Obama administration’s abortion pill mandate, bringing the total number of court rulings against the mandate to 12 compared to four in its favor. Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys and allied attorneys represent Sioux Chief Manufacturing Co. in a federal lawsuit filed last month to challenge the mandate, which forces employers—regardless of their religious or moral convictions—to provide insurance coverage for abortion-inducing drugs, sterilization and contraception under threat of heavy penalties.“ Common sense says that people should not have to violate their religious freedoms in order to conduct business in the public sector. Just as private businesses are free to turn customers away for various reasons (think “no shirt, no shoes, no service”) they are also free to do business based on their religious convictions. This administration is learning just how entrenched that belief is in the Constitution and will hopefully revise the awful mandate. Click here for original article.

Students protest over transgender student’s ‘special treatment’

A recent report from Mississippi is the logical end of the effort to include “gender identity” into school anti-bullying laws. A student at the school, a male, says he is now transitioning to a female and has begun wearing female clothing. Students at the school say that isn’t fair because he is still a male and is being allowed to break the rules to dress like a female. The article states: “Students are protesting Wednesday because they feel they are now being discriminated against because the transgender student is breaking the school’s dress code and they are being punished for doing the same thing.” The problem here is that the students recognize the double standard and lack of common sense. If there is a dress code, it must apply to everyone equally. But elevating the “rights” of homosexuals and transgender people above everyone else will always result in unfair treatment. While the school would never admit it, the students have already said the obvious – they are being discriminated against. This is a clear illustration of why we at the FPCWV opposed the inclusion of “gender identity” into recent anti-bullying laws. Click here for original article.

Ohio court spars on science teacher’s creationist lessons

CBSNews.com reports: “State Supreme Court justices sparred with lawyers on Wednesday in a heated hour of arguments over the extent to which a now-fired public school science teacher had the right to push his religious beliefs in class. A lawyer for the school board that dismissed John Freshwater in 2011 said he waved a Bible at his students, handed out religious pamphlets and espoused creationism in his evolution lessons. Freshwater violated the constitutional separation between church and state and was rightfully fired, said David Smith, an attorney for the Mount Vernon School Board.” The problems here are 1. Evolution is a theory – an unproven idea – and no more right being taught than anything other theory of existence such as Creation. So if it’s appropriate to teach one theory, it should be just as appropriate to teach another; and 2. There is no “constitutional separation between church and state.” The much ballyhooed idea that a “separation clause” exists in our founding documents is false. Read the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, or the Bill of Rights and you won’t find it. Therefore this man has every right to teach a well -rounded science class which explores all possible theories for existence. Click here for original article.

Help Protect the Family Now!     Please click here to give through our secure online server

About Nathan Cherry

Nathan Cherry is the chief editor and blogger for the Engage Family Minute blog, the official blog of the FPCWV. He serves also as the Regional Development Coordinator as a liaison to the pastor's of West Virginia. He is a pro-life, pro-traditional marriage, pro-religious freedom conservative. He is also a husband, father, pastor, author, musician, and follower of Jesus Christ.

WV To Partner with Feds to Run Insurance Exchange

While 26 states decided to let the deadline for opening state-run insurance exchanges pass, several states decided to partner with the federal government to open the insurance exchanges. Most states opted to refuse to open the exchanges for any number of reasons, the most popular being cost, opposition to government controlled insurance, and lack of information. But some decided to partner with the feds and share the cost and control of insurance. West Virginia is one such state, a recent article explains:

“Jeremiah Samples, an official at the West Virginia Insurance Commission, said that West Virginia opted for a partnership exchange because state officials wanted to maintain some control over the regulation of health insurance in the state, but simply could not afford to run their own program. After months of analysis, officials decided that the size of the state’s market and the massive costs associated with information-technology costs necessary to set up the exchange made a state-run option financially unfeasible.” Sadly, West Virginia didn’t stand strong against the government but decided to give in and will no doubt pass the cost along to all of us. Click here for original article.

About Nathan Cherry

Nathan Cherry is the chief editor and blogger for the Engage Family Minute blog, the official blog of the FPCWV. He serves also as the Regional Development Coordinator as a liaison to the pastor's of West Virginia. He is a pro-life, pro-traditional marriage, pro-religious freedom conservative. He is also a husband, father, pastor, author, musician, and follower of Jesus Christ.

Look What West Virginia is Doing to Curb Abortion Funding in ObamaCare

A graph released by LifeNews.com shows what measures states are taking to curb abortion funding in ObamaCare. Americans overwhelmingly agree that public funding – tax dollars – should not be used to fund the abortion business. Though a bi-partisan majority of Americans believe this, President Obama and liberals in the Senate continue to throw money at groups like Planned Parenthood. So states have taken matters into their own hands and began enacting measures to strip abortion funding from ObamaCare. As the article states, the reason for this is “Buried within the individual mandate is the ‘abortion premium mandate.’ This mandate requires that all who are enrolled in insurance plans which cover elective abortion must pay a separate premium which serves as a direct abortion subsidy. This mandate could potentially leave many Americans stuck between a rock and a hard place as they must choose between following their consciences and providing for the healthcare needs of their families.”

So what is West Virginia doing? Nothing. Though our citizens overwhelmingly support life and don’t want public funding being used for abortion, though measures exist to remove public funding from ObamaCare, our lawmakers – to date – have done nothing at all. See for yourself in the graph below. Click here for original article.

 

State Abortion Funding Limits

STATE Public Funding for Indigent States Employee Insurance Exchanges Private Plans
Alabama X X
Alaska
Arizona X X
Arkansas X
California
Colorado X X
Connecticut
Delaware X
District of Columbia X
Florida X X
Georgia X
Hawaii
Idaho X X X X
Illinois X
Indiana X X
Iowa X
Kansas X X X X
Kentucky X X X X
Louisiana X X
Maine X
Maryland
Massachusetts X[ii]
Michigan X
Minnesota
Mississippi X X X
Missouri X X X X
Montana
Nebraska X X X X
Nevada X
New Hampshire X
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina X X
North Dakota X X X X
Ohio X X X
Oklahoma X X X X
Oregon
Pennsylvania X X
Rhode Island X X X[iii]
South Carolina X X X
South Dakota X X
Tennessee X X
Texas X
Utah X X X X
Vermont
Virginia X X X
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin X X
Wyoming X
TOTAL: 34 states prohibit public funding of abortions for indigent women. 18 states restrict abortion coverage in insurance plans for public employees. 20 statesprohibit coverage in plans offered through the exchanges. 8 states have laws restricting insurance coverage of abortion in private insurance plans.

About Nathan Cherry

Nathan Cherry is the chief editor and blogger for the Engage Family Minute blog, the official blog of the FPCWV. He serves also as the Regional Development Coordinator as a liaison to the pastor's of West Virginia. He is a pro-life, pro-traditional marriage, pro-religious freedom conservative. He is also a husband, father, pastor, author, musician, and follower of Jesus Christ.

BREAKING NEWS: HHS Offers ‘Compromise’ on Abortifacient Mandate


Today, the US Department of Health and Human Services issued an expected compromise compelled by a series of lawsuits by religious organizations.

Of course, we should stop and point out that maybe – just maybe – that should have been thought of in the first place, but let’s not get off track too soon.

The proposal comes after several religious organizations brought lawsuits and thousands more are likely to follow in the coming months when their grandfathered provisions come due around August.  The proposed compromise is to not alter the law, but to alter the regulations (adding to the 13,000+ pages of current regulations that implement the 2,500+ pages of the Affordable Care Act) that implement the new health insurance mandate.

HHS is seeking public comment on the proposed rule, of which they will no doubt get plenty.  Here’s how what’s proposed appears to work:

Religious Employers

If you are a religious employer, you can seek an exemption from having to provide contraceptive coverage, assuming that religious employer has a religious objection to so providing.  What is a “religious employer?”  Glad you asked.  According to the proposed rule, a religious employer must meet the following criteria:

  1. Have the inculcation of religious values as its purpose;
  2. Primarily employ persons who share its religious tenets; and
  3. Primarily serve persons who share its religious tenets.

This, the proposal goes on to say, “would primarily include churches, other houses of worship, and their affiliated organizations.”  That’s a pretty narrow subsection of the religious community, if you consider that most religious teachings – and especially traditional Christian teaching – suggests that one’s religion is taught organizationally, but expressed in day-to-day life.

In other words, HHS is giving a nod to offer First Amendment protections to your church, but not necessarily to you.

Non-Profit Religious Organizations

What about Christian Colleges and other non-profit organizations that are religious in nature?

[Read more...]

About Jeremy Dys

Jeremy Dys is the FPCWV's President and General Counsel. In addition to his duties of providing strategic vision and leadership to the FPCWV, Dys is the chief lobbyist and spokesman. Dys is regularly featured in local, state, and national print, radio, and television outlets. He lives close to Charleston with his wife and growing family.